Conceptual Analysis, Dualism and the Explanatory Gap

From PhilosophyWiki.org (public beta)

Jump to: navigation, search
Block, Ned & Stalnaker, Robert (1999). ‘Conceptual Analysis, Dualism and the Explanatory Gap’. The Philosophical Review, 108, pp. 1–46.

To add to this page, click on one of the buttons below, or use the discussion link above to discuss its contents (registered users only).

Create volume indexCategory:Contents of The Philosophical Review/108 | Find on Google Scholar

Authors: Ned BlockNed Block, Robert StalnakerRobert Stalnaker
Source: The Philosophical Review, vol. 108Category:The Philosophical Review/volume 108, 1999, pp. 1–46
Keywords: conceptual analysis , dualism, conceivability argument  [edit] 

@article{block1999c,
    author = "Block, Ned and Stalnaker, Robert",
    title = {Conceptual Analysis, Dualism and the Explanatory Gap},
    journal = "The Philosophical Review",
    volume = "108",
    year = "1999",
    pages = "1--46"}

Synopsis

Click here to add a brief summary or synopsis. Page created by Keith Wilson.

Retrieved from "http://philosophywiki.org/main/Conceptual_Analysis%2C_Dualism_and_the_Explanatory_Gap"